Teaching
Effectively Online
Return
to the class homepage
http://lone-eagles.com/teaching.html
Required
Submissions for Lesson Three: 1. Read
the lesson below, View
the
videos marked View 2.
You have been invited via
email to
join our class wiki Ð
http://web2fork12classrooms.pbworks.com
(One Hour) 3.
Explore: Open Courseware
Initiative and Open
Source Resources
(One hour) explorations and the degree to which you are 1. Excited, and 2. Overwhelmed. |
A Sea Change in Education
Worldwide
Ten
years ago, there was much
debate on whether online learning was in any way comparable to
traditional
classroom learning. Today, the USDOE and National School Board
Association have
recognized that in many cases online learning can produce superior
results over
traditional classroom learning. Teaching essential 21st
Century
Workforce readiness skills is now recognized as inclusive of teaching
proper
uses of social media related to maturely managing a digital reputation,
digital
citizenship, civic engagement, developing effective online
collaboration
skills, and being able to produce new media products to share knowledge
and
educate others.
The commercial Elearning businesses are out-innovating traditional K12 schools and universities. Educators with online teaching skills are being hired by commercial companies in great numbers, further weakening the ability of schools to retain innovate educators. Students are opting for the flexibility of Virtual High Schools and homeschooling Ð creating additional budget shortfalls for school districts.
Much
of the past decade of K12
online learning has been basically putting classroom course content
online in a
standard fashion. There are hundreds of tutorials on how to do this
basic
conversion. The
future however,
will be highly competitive, and will require constant monitoring of the
innovations of others, and constant innovation in order to be
competitive
motivating teachers and learners, alike. You are advised to watch for
the best
innovations of others, to emulate the best-of-the-best in your own
online
course design.
Course Management Systems (CMSÕs) have evolved to integrate course management and delivery features. Currently Blackboard is the leader, having bought WebCT and Elluminate. The open source CMS, Moodle has proved to be very popular, and Blackboard has released its own free CMS.
View
Content Management Systems - Comparisons Website
http://edutools.info Top CMSs
compared by features.
Blackboard Offers
Free Online Course Authoring
Tools
View the video at http://www.coursesites.com
Explore:
Create
Your Own Free Video Course
http://www.udemy.com Optional.
A free service to create video courses
to offer free or for a
fee. Tutorials are available for those who register.
Moodle.org Optional.
One of the most
popular
free online course open source systems, but it requires someone to
manage a
local server. Tutorials and Moodle
resources are
listed within our class wiki at http://web2fork12classrooms.pbworks.com
Edu20
free online course Learning Management System
www.edu20.org Take the Tour Optional.
Online
Course Models to Review:
VIEW:
Conspiracy
Code
http://www.360ed.com/Products/Conspiracy-Code-American-History/
An animated edutainment approach to teaching American History.
VIEW: Module Two in the Pre-challenge training,
showing Twitter,
as an example of their modular approach using video captures to teach
social media
entrepreneurship.
You can learn more about their program viewing the module one short
video, too. You can Òmouse overÓ the module buttons to see the topics
Ðtheir
emphasis
is on presenting sophisticated integrated social media applications for
making
money by producing valuable new media content, smarter education. http://challenge.co/training ItunesU
is used to delivered advanced fee-based instructional content. (5
minutes)
Educators
as Info-Brokers
of the Best-of-the-Best Global Rich Media Resources
Educators
are no longer the ÒSage on the StageÓ but must serve as
the ÒGuide on the Side.Ó Mastery learning and facilitating peer
mentoring are
made possible by a combination of new online tools, quality resources
created
by others, and pedagogies (ala Khanacademy.com) Consider yourself as an
info-broker challenged to identify
and
deliver the very best existing rich
media instruction, from diverse global sources, to your
students, with
emphasis on teaching them to find their own such learning resources, as
self-directed learners, while building effective collaboration skills
with
others.
Many
states have invested in creating their own in-state virtual K12
schools. While
intended to be state-specific and matching state standards, most such
efforts
lack sustainable funding, and ignore the exceptionally high quality of
available resources outside the state.
Online
learning has become a lucrative commercial business and the pace of
innovation
is accelerating. Edutainment, rich media, serious gaming, mobile
learning, and
other trends are pushing traditional educational institutions to adapt
or die.
Bill
Gates, in his book ÒThe Road AheadÓ cites three major growth industries
to pay
close attention to: Entertainment, Social Services, and Education. In
short,
ÒFun, Social, Learning is where the money will be made. Add to this the
recent
boom in Social Media, mobile devices, and the stage is set for
educational
transformation even in the next few years.
Mobile devices have created a new market for mobile
learning, where less is more. Shortening attention spans have created a
competition for who can
deliver the BEST online
instruction designed for the MOST learners, requiring the LEAST time,
effort,
cost, and prerequisite literacy. (Think BESTMOSTLEAST)
In
addition, cloud-based services can minimize the learning curve for
people to
adapt to new tools and CMS environments. And note that CMS environments
and
cloud-based services are merging, as are Elearning
businesses, and Elearning
educational institutions; at
a time where suddenly we find we need to be teaching innovative
entrepreneurship to ÒGrow an entrepreneurial culture starting in
primary grades
so youth will grow up with entrepreneurship as a lifelong option.Ó
Everyone
both learner and teacher, both consumer and producer.
How
best to do this in Alaskan Native Villages who have received new faster
broadband is a big issue as the federal government is reevaluating the
return
on investment of its Universal Service Fund 90% subsidies for village
broadband. The question being whether
broadband-enabled jobs
can be created to grow a sustainable economy in 250+ Alaskan Native
villages.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U
An interesting artistic model
for communicating concepts,
with the topic being the need for K12 educational reform. (11 minutes Ð
5
million views!)
Easy
Rich Media Creation Tools for Educators and Students
VIEW: A
Grammarly Discussion in
the wilds of Africa
by bwardpsg
Created
using goanimate.com
VIEW: Check
out fellow classmate
Tim Coray's very cool
video capture tutorial created
for Lesson one using www.jingproject.com:
Getting
by with crummy internet
http://www.screencast.com/t/FQvhCslZ
Timothy
Coray
Tricks on How to view online
videos via a crummy internet
connection
VIEW: Using Elluminate (now called
Blackboard
Collaborate)
http://www.screencast.com/t/ZAnRvO8qR Created by classmate Adell Bruns.
VIEW: Battle
of the Books Trailer created at animoto.com:
http://animoto.com/play/WchTQL13q6KENcI4rQleCw
You can embed the
code to run your animoto
videos on Facebook or
through
your school webpage
or blog. Educators can apply for a free 6
month
account here: http://animoto.com/education
Explore:
Optional.
Hundreds
of new Web 2.0 tools and media types:
www.go2web20.net
Sorted
by media type, with top ten listed in
upper right.
Next
Generation Web Optional.
A connected
community of innovative
broadband users.
Six
TED Videos Ð A Quick
Review
For
Lesson One you viewed TED videos listed at
http://lone-eagles.com/teachingwelcome.html
And
this first video listed in Lesson One.
The
ÒHow Web Video Empowers
Global InnovationÓ video
is perhaps the most dramatic video presented in this course, regarding
implications for global competition regarding the best, short,
educational
units on literally all topics, with new, better educational units
growing in
number as more and more people are spurred to higher levels of
innovation by
what they see others doing with Internet videos.
Weaving the best-of-the-best into your curriculums is
proving to be a competitive necessity.
The
virtual choir video is a look at whatÕs
possible well beyond
Facebook Ð bringing
together the faces and
voices of thousands worldwide.
HereÕs
a similar site
(Optional)
VIEW: Six
Billion Others ÐShort Video Overview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMv3oYHTLMA
(6 minutes)
The Six Billon Others Web Site http://www.6milliardsdautres.org/
Optional
The
Khan Academy video presented an
effective STEM mastery
learning model supported by 2200 quality videos, and goes well beyond
STEM.
Bill Gates and Google have funded the project touting the model as the
future
of education.
The
Hole in the Wall video demonstrated an
effective student
self-directed online learning model from India, where there are not
enough
teachers. Reference is made to the Granny Cloud Ð citing the
motivational
aspect of eldersÕ attention Ð independent of any direct context
expertise.
Melinda
GatesÕ video talks about Aspirational
Marketing, and while Coca-Cola was used as an example, potential
citizen
engagement in all types of social education initiatives was the point.
The
collaborative
consumption video
presented a $100 billion/year sharing economy, citing many specific
examples of
how new online services that save people money -by facilitating smarter
sharing
-are growing in number, and these service businesses are making money,
too. The
book represents a review of the literature on new innovative ways to
use online
services smarter in a time of budget crisis. Keeping up on such things
will
prove essential in our age of accelerating change Ð as a survival skill
to impart to our students.
Decisions
for Designing an
Online Course:
When
an educator selects an online course authoring system, the educator may
become
inherently limited by the features that system does and doesn't have.
For
instance, some systems allow a whiteboard, where students and teachers
can
exchange drawings, or write mathematical formulas, with an electronic
pen;
others don't. It is a good idea to thoroughly compare available tools
before
deciding on a course authoring system.
Standards
for online courses are continually changing as tools improve and
educators gain
experience with alternatives. Just as the first web pages you
saw were at
first amazing, and later seemed substandard, so too are online courses
creating
higher standards as we all become more experienced.
Expectations
increase with experience; our expectations shift as we become aware of
better
and better applications. Currently, any online course is
generally considered to be 'sophisticated,' just by being
"online." But, as teachers and students become acquainted with better
models for student engagement, interaction, and motivation, the
standards for
what constitutes a really good online course will change significantly.
The design
for interpersonal attention, and engaging interaction, will dominate
this
assessment dynamic.
As
teachers, we need to maintain a healthy skepticism. Just because a
course's web
pages are pretty to look at or incorporate the latest neat multimedia
features,
it does not necessarily mean they incorporate the best educational
methods and
pedagogies. Nor does it mean they produce measureable learning
outcomes,
engaging interaction, or that they motivate students.
On
the other hand, just because a course is self-directed, may not mean
students
are not learning from the well-written thoughts and perspectives from
the heart
and mind of a great teacher. A course touting use of collaborative
tools, may,
in fact, misuse them!
The
course goals, thoughtful design, incorporation of the best resources,
and
selection of appropriate presentation technologies, to present the
curriculum
in the very best ways possible, are all factors to consider. Your
common sense
as a good educator, coupled with thorough review of online
instructional
options, will be all you need to become an excellent online educator!
Don't be
in too much of a hurry; take the time to carefully assess your online
teaching
alternatives.
The
"shelf-life" of an online course can be as little as six months, as
URLS change regularly. Planning for an online course is often far more
demanding than preparing for a traditional classroom presentation or activity.
Students
sitting at computers using collaborative tools,
might
look socially isolated to the untrained eye, but they might well be
more
collaboratively engaged, with more peers per unit time, than if they
were in a
traditional classroom. This is particularly true with larger class
sizes, where
the classroom is more a lecture setting than an interactive
environment.
Since
many teachers have yet to take their first online class, and many
students have
far more experience using the Internet and collaborating online, it can
be
difficult for teachers to understand the readiness of students to use
the
Internet as a collaborative medium.
An
online course, such as this one, may avoid use of unnecessary graphics
to allow
efficient use by those with slow Internet access. Or, a course, as the
Shakespeare course you've reviewed, it may use sophisticated graphics
and web-design
techniques. The time you'll have available will determine how you
approach
creating an online course. The time required for authoring an online
course can
vary widely with the functionality of producing measureable outcomes
being the
true test of quality. As this current course demonstrates,
incorporating
existing resources can dramatically reduce the time required to create
an
online course, while keeping the quality at a high level.
The
issue becomes; "What web tools do you need to teach the content in the
style you'd prefer?"
The following checklist will
give you a starting place for assessing, and designing online course
format
options, independent of your assessment of the quality of their
application.
Course
Assessment Checklist
BANDWIDTH, SOFTWARE AND
TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS?
SELF-DIRECTED vs
INSTRUCTOR-CENTRIC?
INDIVIDUALIZED
VS GROUP-ORIENTED?
LESSON STRUCTURE (FIXED VS
FLEXIBLE)?
CONTENT
TYPE: SKILLS VS CONCEPTUAL LEARNING?
INTERACTION
DESIGN WITH MEDIA ?
INTERACTION DESIGN FOR HUMAN
INTERACTION?
TIMEFRAME?
(FIXED VS ON-GOING)
ASSESSMENT
METHOD(S)?
-------------(End of
Checklist)
Checklist
Explanations:
Bandwidth, Software, and
Technology requirements:
A low budget, low-tech class might involve simple web pages only,
allowing use
by those with slow modems and older computers. A high budget, high tech
class
might involve advanced
multimedia and interactive
television. Will students be required to have the latest version of web
browsers with audio and video capabilities? The lowest common
denominator for
technology requirements must be made very clear for a given online
experience.
Self-Directed VS
Instructor-Centric:
A
class can be self-directed, or instructor-interaction
intensive, with a whole range of options in-between, such as small
group
interaction with a high level of one-to-one student interaction, or a
large
group interaction with a low level of one-to-one student interaction. A
self-directed course can potentially work with any number of students,
whereas
an instructor-centric course has limitations due to the amount of
interaction
the instructor can adequately handle.
Issues for a Self-Directed
Course
A self-directed course represents one extreme, that can still be highly
interactive using high quality CDROM's,
software
tutorials, and interactive web sites, which are rapidly becoming more
sophisticated. Lessons can be completed at the learner's discretion and
potentially in any order.
Issues for an
Instructor-Centric interactive course:
Similar
to a traditional classroom, the instructor would lead all discussions
and
activities and the participants would need to keep up or wait for the
rest of
the group, lesson by lesson.
To
emulate a traditional classroom experience a teacher can decide to lead
discussions by posting messages to a web conference or listserv. When
every
student contributes, the number of messages will depend on class size.
As a
teacher, we'll need to know when we'll reach an unmanagable
number of messages.
How
will you assess student performance, knowing some students will post
messages
as required, but are not genuinely interested or engaged, while others
are highly
engaged, prolific writers, and may find themselves resented by the less
motivated students? The online medium tends to amplify certain student
differences, particularly their writing ability and willingness to
interact
openly and honestly.
If
you assign 5 small group discussions, with students as discussion
moderators,
for five discussions of five students each, and each student posts 3
message a
day, for three class days per week, how many messages must each student
read
per week (5x3x3=45 msgs)
and how many messages will
you scan per week as a teacher? (45x5=225.)
This
doesn't take into account highly motivated or articulate students...who
can be
expected to author longer messages as they gain confidence. An
unobrusive measure would
be to measure the number of
pages of writing produced by each student and/or discussion group. A
subjective
accounting of the value and content of the interaction would be another
measure.
Lesson Structure: Fixed VS
Flexible
Lessons
could be required to be completed by specified dates and in a specific
order,
or the student could be given the option to decide which lessons to
complete by
which dates, within general guidelines.
Content Type: Skills VS
Conceptual Learning
A
course may be focused on teaching skills such as desktop-publishing
in a step-by-step format measured by multiple choice questions. Or, as
in a
philosophy course, more conceptual instruction may focus on discussion,
sharing
thoughts in writing about required reading assignments, or discussing
ideas
raised by other participants. Assessment could be subjective analysis
of
participants' writings.
Depending
on your teaching goals, interaction with various media (using high
quality CDROM's,
software tutorials, and interactive web sites,)
may be the best approach, or perhaps interaction with people would be
more
appropriate. These are two extremes, with many levels using both
features
in-between.
Consider:
Interaction Design with
Human Interaction
If
the goal of an English class is to engage students in reading and
writing
discussion, after having read a
book
by a specific author, online interaction might well be superior to a
classroom
setting by allowing for more overall interaction per unit time, and
vigorous
exercise of reading and writing skills, in a shareable, documented
format after
the interaction has taken place.
If
the goal of a philosophy class is
to make students
think and articulate their thoughts, would an online discussion or
face-to-face
discussion be best? What would Socrates choose,
if he
had these choices? Or, when exactly would one be better than the other?
Socrates might say "The
ideal would be a
combination of the best features of both these verbal and
written forms
of interaction."
Interaction Design with
Media
If
the goal of a biology class is to teach the human anatomy, a high
quality,
well-organized interactive CDROM might provide the student with more
interactive individualized learning per unit time than a classroom
setting. The
teachers' role might shift from presenting the content, to selecting
the most
efficient content presentation, and focusing on articulations and
higher
contextual discussion to increase the meaning of the content. Freeing
the
teacher to provide more focused individual attention for those who need
it is
another option.
We've
all had some teachers who did little more than present information,
often
reading from their notes. If their notes were made available online,
supplemented with multimedia interactive resources and examples, the
online
version would be individualized, more interactive, perhaps more
efficient, and
possibly more entertaining and motivating for students. The
time saved by
the teacher could be applied toward individual assistance to those
students
needing special help.
A
course may offer a choice of learning styles, or may offer only one
choice,
depending on the multimedia tools and the availability of the time to
create
alternative presentations. While offering this type of choice is an
advantage
of multimedia systems, the time available for teachers to create such
alternative presentations is often lacking. Such systems can typically
be
created for only large scale
applications, which
brings us to one advantage of corporations creating high quality
learning
materials.
Timeframe for intended learning
community:
Community networking and online learning are
blurring around the theme of "building learning communities."
An online course could define a finite timeframe for interaction,
whereas an
online community of interest may set no such time limitations.
As teachers of an online class, we don't necessary have to say good bye to our students when a
course ends, but can
continue the relationship through the convenience of email and other
collaborative tools. Many opportunities exist for creating ongoing
online
learning communities to sustain interest and learning with students.
The Open Courseware Initiative is one example of a
global
Rich
Media Content Sites
for Educators Ð A Short Sampling
All are Optional.
Eduforge
http://eduforge.org Open
Source
Learning Lab
Sourceforge
www.sourceforge.org Open
source
software consortium.
*Moodle being one of the best
examples.
Learner.org
www.learner.org See student interactives www.learner.org/interactives
A major educational portal Ð searchable by grade level and topic, with a link to interactive units.
The
Portal to the World of Knowledge
http://www.educating.net
Links
to many sources of online learning and teaching.
MERLOT http://www.merlot.org
Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online
Teaching Extensive
collected multimedia resources by topic.
IMS http://www.imsproject.org Instructional
Management Systems standards - an industry site focused on promoting
standards
among all Instructional Management Systems so content can be easily
shifted
between systems.
An
Introduction: What are Learning
Objects?
http://www4.uwm.edu/cie/learning_objects.cfm?gid=55
A rich array of resources from the Univ. of Wisconsin's Center for
International Education. See also their "Collections
of Learning Objects"
The
following Hewlett Foundation report
addresses this potential in depth:
A Review of the Open Educational Resources Movement (OER) Achievements,
Challenges, and New Opportunities http://www.oerderves.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/a-review-of-the-open-educational-resources-oer-movement_final.pdf (Start
at page 33.)
YouTube.com/Teachers
- Learn, Teach, Share through YouTube
http://youtube.com/teachers
Curious
about how to
effectively incorporate YouTube into your classroom?
Looking for ways to engage
the visual learners in your group? Want to access a vast array of free
educational content to support your lectures? Hoping to extend the
power of
your teaching to a global audience through video? Look no further than
YouTube.com/teachers, a resource for educators of all levels that will
empower
you to learn, teach and share through YouTube.
Google
for
Educators
Thinkfinity
Teachers
Domain
Free
Instructional Videos Ð How India is
leveraging global video
content
http://freevideolectures.com/blog/2010/11/130-nptel-iit-online-courses/
Mashable
http://mashable.com
Social
Media sharing site (to mash up is to utilize the work of others in
creating
curriculum.
Required Submissions Checklist:
____ Posted your name on our wiki front page with
three preferred resource topics listed after your name.
Our class wiki is at http://teachingonlinewiki.pbworks.com
____ Created your own wiki page with topical preferences posted.
____ Send instructor a private email with candid feedback on this lesson.
Lesson Feedback:
You're invited to privately email your instructor:
1. What areas, if any, did you have trouble with during this
lesson?
2. What questions remain now that you've finished this lesson?
3. Approximately how much time did you devote to this lesson?
4. What improvements would you like to suggest?